Thursday, November 12, 2009

2nd Rough Draft WP2

Anthropomorphism has been used through religion, mythology, literature, and now in popular culture. It is the act of giving human characteristics to non-human beings (Wikipedia). In religion certain animals, or half human and half animals, are symbols of gods. In early literature anthropomorphism was a well known literary device. For example in Aesop’s Fables, animals and weather were used to illustrate moral lessons (Wikipedia). Anthropomorphism has since been used to add humor in cartoons, literature, and even our television shows. In the past our culture found anthropomorphism humorous when it was placed in entertainment. For example in the comic strip Garfield, he talks to his owner Jon like it is an everyday conversation. We don’t think twice about the fact that he is talking in the first place. But as time has passed, it is not seen as something unusual anymore. We know it is not true in real life, but when we dive into literature or comics we put that aside and it is a common and natural thing. This comic strip plays off of the idea of the cat chasing the dog, but also attempts to remind us about anthropomorphism. Anthropomorphism is shown in this comic through the context of the image, the typography, and the aesthetics placed throughout the comic.

In this scene, a cat is standing in front of an open dryer. In between the washer and the wall, the dog is hiding. He has formed a plot to make the cat climb in, or reach, the dryer. He has even written directions on the door leading into the laundry room, the floor, and the dryer itself. The dog is using the statement “cat fud” to lure the cat to his desired location. In the background the dog is pleading to himself saying “oh please, oh please…” He is hoping that his plan will succeed.

The context of this comic strip is the dog chasing cat or predator vs. prey theme. Many cartoons and comic strips have used anthropomorphism to make more interesting ways for the theme to be carried out. In Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner, Wiley is tries to find any possible way to catch and eat the Road Runner. Traps, bombs, parachutes and more are all used my Wiley like it was no big deal. He sometimes chases after him with a fork and knife in hand and a bib around his neck, licking his lips and hoping he reaches his goal. In my chosen comic strip the dog is standing on his two hind legs hoping he won’t be seen. Interestingly enough, Wiley runs on his hind legs like a human is generally able to. In another cartoon show called Tom and Jerry, the mouse Jerry runs away from Tom on his two hind legs. He carries cheese on his back like it is luggage and even sits cross legged while he watches Tom get in trouble. Animals that don’t normally move around on two legs are standing around, walking, or chasing things while only using two legs. In these cartoons, anthropomorphism is used to make the animals literate. I Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner, Both Wiley and the Road Runner are given the ability to read. Wiley has to be literate to read the instructions for each of the “ACME” objects he uses against the Road Runner, while the Road Runner is able to read signs put in place by the coyote. Just like in other predator vs. prey comics and shows, Tom and Jerry is a show about the different ways in which Tom, a cat, tries to catch the mouse Jerry. Each time these cartoon predators try to strike, it all backfires or plans don’t go the way they intended. And yet they still include anthropomorphism. These anthropomorphic animals blush when they are embarrassed, have steam blowing out of their ears, or even stomp off mad when their plans fell through; these are things that never happen outside of comic Animals that don’t normally move around on two legs are running around chasing others with items or ideas that humans would use.

In Compose Design Advocate (279), typography is defined as the study of how letter shapes work rhetorically and functionally. Typography is used in this comic between the two forms of dialogue. This “chicken scratch” that is written on the floor and doors makes the dog seem literate and able to form ideas and put plans into motion. Yet there is one flaw in the dogs “literacy”, he is unable to spell out such a simplistic word as food. This starts to undermine the dog’s intelligence and makes the viewer question his motive. When looking closely at the writing on the box, it is slanted and looks like it was hastily written on the side. Inside the thought bubble, the dog’s thoughts are written in a much neater script. It proves that his thoughts are not completely scatterbrained.

Finally, the aesthetic elements in the comic reinforce the predator vs. prey theme and combine it with anthropomorphism. This comic strip is set in what viewers would believe to be a laundry room. He pieces in seemingly pointless and common details into the picture, however each element works together to give the viewer more insight. The directions and written words give the idea of a plot made to draw the cat into the laundry room. Not only is this giving him/her human-like qualities, it is also representing some sort of intelligence in regards to the dog. With the cat standing in front of the dryer with the text on the door, our assumption becomes clearer in that we can now bring to consideration that his plan is to make the cat crawl into the dryer to have the door shut on it. At first glance, you see the box on top of the washer as cat food that the dog probably used to try and lure the cat into the dryer. However, the cupboard door above the washer and dryer is open. This cupboard is, in most cases, where most people keep their detergent for their laundering needs. Detergent, as we know, is not meant for consumption in any case. A dog climbing up to get the detergent from the cabinet and putting it into the dryer is not seen as a big surprise. Another element in this image is the word “ACME” written on the front of the detergent box. If we go back again to the Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner cartoon, we can see that every object that Wiley uses to try and capture the Road Runner has the same word written on the box or item itself. When you combine the fact that the box not only comes from a detergent cabinet, but is also labeled “ACME” you can come to the conclusion that it is meant to kill or injure the cat. Just like in the other predator vs. prey comics or cartoons, the dog has gained the intelligence and plotting ability that is well known to humans. And even further, with the placement upon the washing machine viewers can assume that it was put into the dryer for the cat to eat. This set up is made into a Wiley Coyote and Road Runner relationship between the cat and dog and instills once again the well known cat chasing dog idea.

Gary Larson has used elements in this comic that show the dog chasing cat theme. Like in older cartoons and comic strips the artists enhance their characters through anthropomorphism. However, it is now shoved under the rug like it is common everyday occurrences to have a dog talk to its owner, or run around on its hind legs to get to a desired goal. Larson presented this argument through his many animal characters in his Far Side comics to try and bring back the humor of animals being able to use characteristics of humans.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

1st draft WP2

Gary Larson on January 1, 1980 and continued until his retirement in 1995. Ironically, his last comic strip was run on January first of that year. He told fans that he was afraid the comics would begin to get old or boring, and he didn’t want to continue writing similar comics that would be all to similar to others (Wikipedia). Unlike the multiple paneled comics of others, the Far Side comics were one panel. Gary Larson creates most of his comics with animals implemented and given human-like qualities, or anthropomorphically. For example some of his work included the way cows behave while humans are not watching or spiders driving in a family car (Wikipedia). And often the behaviors or qualities of humans are compared with those of the animals (Wikipedia). In addition his humor was also based upon uncomfortable social situations or searches for the meaning of life. These characteristics made Gary Larson’s comics unique.

In this comic, Gary Larson tests the stereotypical roles of common household pets. Any person can recognize or remember the “dog chases cat” scenario. It has been around since before many of us ever knew. It is like the Road Runner and Wiley Coyote cartoon we all grew up knowing; predator vs. prey. In this cartoon a dog is standing in between a washing machine and the wall while a cat stands in front of an open dryer. Through our past experiences or preconceived thoughts, we are able to form together our own interpretation or idea about the comic presented.
When most think of the relationship between cat and dog, they think of the constant battle between the two. In other comic strips, the dog is generally seen as the less intelligent participant of the situation while the cat is more mischievous and intelligent. We can base this knowledge off of things we have seen in the past. For example, we can take what we have previously seen in the comic strip Garfield. In this comic strip Garfield is always getting unsuspected Odie into trouble or having fun at his expense. Odie is portrayed as a dog that just runs around with his tongue hanging out and not really knowing what is going on. In Gary Larson’s Far side comic, the roles are somewhat altered. Instead, we are directed to believe that the dog in this comic has devised this plan to lure the cat to the desired location. This is something we would traditionally assume the cat would have done to a dog.

This comic strip is set in what viewers would believe to be a laundry room. He pieces in seemingly pointless and common details into the picture, however each element works together to give the viewer more insight. They can also propose more insight to an argument or claim the illustrator was trying to portray. By themselves each portion is meaningless, however when each element creates one broad image and idea. There are two main forms of dialogue in this comic. Based upon the other elements in the comic, we are led to believe that they both are coming from the perspective of the dog. Earlier it was mentioned that Gary Larson was pushing on the stereotypes or roles of cats and dogs in their rivalry. The directions and written words give the idea of a plot made to draw the cat into the laundry room. Not only is this giving him/her human-like qualities, it is also representing some sort of intelligence in regards to the dog. In Compose Design Advocate(279), typography is defined as the study of how letter shapes work rhetorically and functionally. Typography is used in this comic between the two forms of dialogue. This “chicken scratch” that is written on the floor and doors makes the dog seem literate and able to form ideas and put plans into motion. Yet there is one flaw in the dogs “literacy”, he is unable to spell out such a simplistic word as food. This starts to undermine the dogs intelligence and makes the viewer question his motive. The placement of his writing causes the viewer to follow the text just as the cat would have. The second set of dialogue is placed in a cloud shaped circle with smaller circles decreasing in size until they reach the top of his head. Us as viewers depict this simple form of typography to be the dog’s unspoken words or thoughts. It is in much neater handwriting than that of the text that we assume is the directions he set out. When we place together this text with the surrounding illustrations we get a still a more complex insight.
With the cat standing in front of the dryer with the text on the door, our assumption becomes clearer in that we can now bring to consideration that his plan is to make the cat crawl into the dryer to have the door shut on it. At first glance, you see the box on top of the washer as cat food that the dog probably used to try and lure the cat into the dryer. However, the cupboard door above the washer and dryer is open. This cupboard is, in most cases, where most people keep their detergent for their laundering needs. Detergent, as we know, is not meant for consumption in any case. It also has the word “ACME” written on the front of it. If we go back again to the Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner cartoon, we can see that every object that Wiley uses to try and capture the Road Runner has the same word written on the box or item itself.

When you combine the fact that the box not only comes from a detergent cabinet, but is also labeled “ACME” you can come to the conclusion that it is meant to kill. And even further, with the placement upon the washing machine viewers can assume that it was put into the dryer for the cat to eat. This set up is made into a Wiley Coyote and Road Runner relationship between the cat and dog and instills once again the well known cat chasing dog idea.
Now that we have an argument set out, it is important to keep in mind the reason artists create comics ranging from one panel to multiple. Comics can be used for a variety of reasons. Some people use comics as a way to criticize governments, leaders, ideas or other things. These comics are generally seen in the editorial section. While other comics, sometimes referred to Funnies, are located in the comic section of the newspaper are more are used for more of a care free kind of feel to allow people to relax or get a couple laughs. They come in a variety of topics, characters, and detail. Some can be as simple as stick people while others have more intricate detail and multiple panels. In terms of humor, artists can make the humor in their comic stand out while others make you think in order to appreciate the joke. In this context Gary Larson can present his topics in a setting in which they will be much appreciated. In comic strips even the simplistic details cause an idea based upon our past experiences and preconceived thoughts.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

WP2: Statement of Purpose

I chose this comic for my personal background with it, and also for Far Side’s quirky way with comics. When I was younger my mother had a coffee mug with the same comic on the front. My brother and I would fight over that mug even though we vowed to never drink coffee in our lives. I would read it over and over each time I got a hold of the mug. This essay is important to show possible meanings of the comic and to analyze the aesthetic portions of this comic.

To pick out a comic that would fit with the objective of the project I had to sift through many sights to find a comic that I felt would fit and give me opportunities to find an argument that I would be able to present. The purpose for finding an adequate comic is to practice analyzing comic strips and presenting our findings as a grade to more or less argue that we know how, and are able to find the rhetorical objects in comics. I thought that the comic in which I chose would be presented so that my audience would see better my view of the comic.

In order to present an adequate essay involving this particular comic, it is important to keep in mind the audience. Although the majority of my audience will be composed of fellow class members, and my professor for feedback, it is still important to make it presentable to other audiences as well. Due to the fact that we post our written work on a blog for grading, that leaves room for a larger audience. It now widens the audience to those who visit our blogging site and essentially all those using the internet. I want the audience to see my argument. I believe it will be easier than most however. I want my audience to be able to relate to the age old cat vs. dog dilemma, and how it is represented in the comic itself. I must remember to focus on the important details so that the appropriate message is conveyed. There are countless people who have viewed this comic. Far Side fanatics, people just reading the newspaper, and other audiences.

The context in which I am another factor that can drastically affect my essay and the argument I present. Dogs are seen as “man’s best friend” while the cats are more the intellectual and intelligent animal in households that are constantly trying to get the dog to fail. This stereotype is shown by the misspelling of the word food and instead putting "cat fud". However the dog seems to be intelligent enough to come up with a way that can eliminate the cat from competition. The comic tries to bend the stereotype by showing these roles slightly reversed. Instead the cat is being targeted and the “protector” of the household is now seeking out revenge. The context in which I present this comic is important to show my interpreted argument of the comic.
In conclusion I am going to put into consideration my audience and the context in which I will be presenting my thoughts. I will need to alter my wording and adequately present ways in which my argument is shown in the comic itself and show proof shown aesthetically and rhetorically throughout.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Pre-write #2


Everyone remembers the random comics that gave you that “Ah-Ha!” moment. The simplistic ones like cows standing and talking until cars pass by. The Far Side comics are loved by many and continue to provide humor today. The author of the Far Side comics, Gary Larson, developed humor in his comics with many reoccurring themes. He used more or less simplistic panels and text that still evoked many people to laugh, causing them to come back for more.


Larson’s comics were mostly based on uncomfortable social situations, improbable events, the meaning in life and many other topics (The Far Side, Wikipedia). You could find many of his works featuring animals, aliens, cavemen, and people stranded on desert islands. Unlike many other comics that were produced over the years, there was no “main character” that was featured in every edition. They consisted of random every day people in weird situations or places, or animals with human qualities. The one paneled comics were printed from January 1, 1980 to January 1, 1995. It was carried by over 1,900 daily newspapers, and reruns are still printed (The Far Side, Wikipedia).


Larson used a combination of visual and verbal elements in each of his comics. The pictures would explain the type and in turn, the type also explained the picture. These comics would consist of text put at the top or bottom of the image as a header, explanation, or the dialogue itself; while some would have dialogue boxes in the picture itself. However many of them contained both to explain why the character in the panel was doing or saying something. Larson’s comics allowed a lot of room for the audience to interpret it in their own way. They tapped into what experience or knowledge you have with the topic and caused you to come up with your own response.


Taking away from the history or background of Larson’s comics and the topics and information from Compose Design Advocate, you can better understand some of the rhetorical and aesthetic elements that make up the chosen topic. The animals in this comic are given human-like qualities, like many of Larson’s comics. Readers know that in reality, dogs don’t stand on their back legs to behind a dryer and plot against the cat. We also fully know that a dog can’t write and a cat can’t read. But yet we interpret it and let the dog have the ability to develop a trap for the cat.


Typography allows us to look deeper into the text provided in the comic. The text written in each of the comics is able to adequately describe, explain, or give insight to the meaning and purpose of the comic. The combination of chicken scratches that misspell the word “food”, and the dog’s “Oh please, oh please…” thought bubble makes it easier for us to assume the dog hiding wants to cause the cat to jump in the dryer. Gary Larson combines the aesthetics of the picture, i.e. the dog and cats placement in the picture, and typography to influence the thoughts and interpretations of his comics.

Works Cited
Far Side. Wikipedia. Retrieved (2009, October 29) from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Far_Side

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

WP2: Comic Strip

I chose the Pickles comics, by Brian Crane, to select the comic in which I would use for my next writing assignment. Pickles has been one of the comics I have enjoyed since I started reading comics in the newspaper. My family never subscribed for the newspaper. So whenever my brother and I were able to get our hands on a newspaper, we went straight to the comics

Pickles follows a retired couple in their seventies. Earl and Opal go back and forth with bickering. Earl is a difficult and stubborn man, and Opal is more kindhearted. In this comic strip, Opal is trying to convince Earl to volunteer with her to give back to the community. Earl slings back saying that he has given back to the community by helping an old lady cross the street. By this statement he was trying to get out of the work and insulting his wife at the same time. Opal realizes this and gets upset with his remark. Readers that have never read the Pickles comic strip before are able to assume, from just a short four paneled comic, that Opal is a kinder individual that just wants to help those around her. On the other side it is also easy to see Earl’s behavior and individualistic emotions. The format of this comic allows for readers to pick up on the emotions and information from the simplicity of four pictures and four dialogue bubbles. Its simple background is made up of a couch and its foot rest. Opal and Earl are just sitting in what can be assumed as a living room, Earl with his paper and Opal trying to talk to him while he is focusing on his paper.

Each of the panels is able to connect together and thus work together to help the reader to relate to the comic and get the main ideas. They are also forced to look more at the two characters sitting in what the readers are made to believe is the living room because of the lack of other objects in view. When the comic starts out the view is more spread out and you can see both Earl and Opal, while in the two center panels you are focused on the face of Opal and then the face of Earl. This makes the reader focus on what the character is saying instead of focusing in on the whole scene. Then at the last panel the focus is then brought back out so that you can see the broader picture. When the reader is brought back to see both Earl and Opal they are able to see that Earl is no longer in the conversation anymore and has gone back to reading his paper and ignoring Opal.

The font in the dialogue bubbles makes the mood of the comic more care free and relaxed as opposed to a very blocky font that would evoke the thought of seriousness. Instead, readers are able to view this comic strip as a lighthearted comedy.