Pre-Writing assignment #2

For our third writing project we were assigned a sculpture that is displayed at the Sheldon art museum. My sculpture was created by Tony Smith in 1962 and is composed of welded steel. “Willy” is an abstract piece of art that was placed in the back of the museum with other sculptures of the museum. However unlike many of the sculptures located in the same area, it was in a more open section of landscape.

“Willy” is a seemingly simplistic shape of art. It contains three points at which it is held above the ground. Like many of his other works of art, these portions of smooth metal are sculpted with sharp edges and defined points. Its black steel shows more of a geometrical shape that lacks curves of any kind. If you look from different angles, what you thought was the basic shape or structure changes into a whole different perspective. In a way, Tony Smith caused what initially thought was rather simplistic into a work of art that makes you think about the purpose. The title of this sculpture “Willy” gave me a bit of confusion. At first, I felt the name “Willy” had no purpose or relation to the sculpture itself. I looked up possible definitions of the word to try and bring more sense of it. Most of these definitions related the word back to willow trees and some related to the name William. Most of these definitions referenced back to willow trees. One talked about willow trees that are characterized by their tough and pliable twigs or branches. I felt that this had some relation to Tony Smith’s sculpture in some way. “Willy” is made out of welded steel. Steel is a strong modified metal. It has traits of elasticity, hardness and strength based on its heat treatment. It made me think of willow branches and their pliable and tough nature.

Tony Smith has created other sculptures that are quite similar to “Willy”. The concept of the rhetorical element, logos, is presented through visual unity, visual hierarchy, and how many visual elements are presented in the sculptures themselves. Unlike some of the sculptures around “Willy”, Tony Smith decided to use a limited amount of elements in this work of art and in each of his sculptures. “Willy” contains welded steel formed into the desired shape, and colored black. This keeps the audience from wondering which part of the art is the one to be focused on. There is also a sense of visual hierarchy in this piece of art. When you get passed the big picture of the sculpture with sharp edges and bent pieces, you can start to divide up each portion into smaller pieces. As I was walking around “Willy” to get a better sense of the sculpture, I noticed that I could identify different geometrical shapes within the art piece. There were triangles, a hexagon, rectangles, squares, and parallelograms. All these pieces work together to make this sculpture. This visual unity of each piece makes the sculpture the way Tony Smith intended.

WP3: pre-write #1

In regards to artwork and sculptures, I have very little experience. Though I have no experience, I do enjoy going to museums or looking at sculptures I see on vacations. Unfortunately, prior to this project I have not taken into consideration the rhetorical aspects of them or the purpose of its shape or color.

Throughout my life I have been taken to museums that show peoples artwork from the distant past to present. My grandfather has a passion for history not only in text books but seeing tangible evidence of things in the past. Like my grandfather, I was always interested in each art piece and respected, and sometimes envied their skill. My uncle is even an artist and musician whom I idolized for quite a long time. However as I grew older I saw him less and less. The school district I was in did not really push us towards art much either. We were required to take three art courses in middle school and needed to take one semester of either a music class or art class in high school. In concurrence to this, I also became very involved with sports and other activities with friends, church, band, and school. This made it difficult for our family to take trips or take time to visit museums with my grandfather like we used to. So as of late I have not seen or been exposed to art objects or paintings.

I was very happy to be able and think through the different aspects of Breach during class. I seemed to have a small idea of how to analyze the sculpture but I knew that I had a lot of improvement to make. I think that abstract artwork will be especially difficult for me. With my lack of exposure to art sculptures I will have to expand from just my view of the sculpture and try to think of ways others might see it. I am rather excited for this project; however I am anxious for my analysis.

WP2 Final draft

Anthropomorphism has been used through religion, mythology, literature, and now in popular culture. It is the act of giving human characteristics to non-human beings (Wikipedia). In religion certain animals, or half human and half animals, are symbols of gods. In early literature anthropomorphism was a well known literary device. For example in Aesop’s Fables, animals and weather were used to illustrate moral lessons (Wikipedia). Anthropomorphism has since been used to add humor in cartoons, literature, and even our television shows. In the past our culture found anthropomorphism humorous when it was placed in entertainment. For example in the comic strip Garfield, he talks to his owner John like it is an everyday conversation. We don’t think twice about the fact that he is talking in the first place. But as time has passed, it is not seen as something unusual anymore. We know it is not true in real life, but when we dive into literature or comics we put that aside and it is a common and natural thing. This comic strip plays off of the idea of the cat chasing the dog, but also attempts to remind us about anthropomorphism. Anthropomorphism is shown through the context of the image, the typography, and the aesthetics placed throughout the comic.

In this scene, a cat is standing in front of an open dryer. In between the washer and the wall, the dog is hiding. He has formed a plot to make the cat climb in, or reach, the dryer. He has even written directions on the door leading into the laundry room, the floor, and the dryer itself. The dog is using the statement “cat fud” to lure the cat to his desired location. In the background the dog is pleading to himself saying “oh please, oh please…” He is hoping that his plan will succeed.

The context of this comic strip is the dog chasing cat or predator vs. prey theme. Many cartoons and comic strips have used anthropomorphism to make more interesting ways for the theme to be carried out. In Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner, Wiley is tries to find any possible way to catch and eat the Road Runner. Traps, bombs, parachutes and more are all used my Wiley like it was no big deal. He sometimes chases after him with a fork and knife in hand and a bib around his neck, licking his lips and hoping he reaches his goal. In my chosen comic strip the dog is standing on his two hind legs hoping he won’t be seen. Interestingly enough, Wiley runs on his hind legs like a human is generally able to. In another cartoon show called Tom and Jerry, the mouse Jerry runs away from Tom on his two hind legs. He carries cheese on his back like it is luggage and even sits cross legged while he watches Tom get in trouble. Animals don’t normally move around on two legs, stand around, or walk or chase things while only using two legs. In these cartoons, anthropomorphism is used to make the animals literate. I Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner, both Wiley and the Road Runner are given the ability to read. Wiley has to be literate to read the instructions for each of the “ACME” objects he uses against the Road Runner, while the Road Runner is able to read signs put in place by the coyote. Just like in other predator vs. prey comics and shows, Tom and Jerry is a show about the different ways in which Tom, a cat, tries to catch the mouse Jerry. Each time these cartoon predators try to strike, it all backfires or plans don’t go the way they intended. And yet they still include anthropomorphism. These anthropomorphic animals blush when they are embarrassed, have steam blowing out of their ears, or even stomp off mad when their plans fell through; these are things that never happen outside of comic animals that don’t normally move around on two legs are running around chasing others with items or ideas that humans would use.

In Compose Design Advocate (pg. 279), typography is defined as the study of how letter shapes work rhetorically and functionally. It enables the artist to add emotion and enhance their ideas. Typography is used in this comic between the two forms of dialogue. We can once again relate Gary Larson’s comic back to Wiley the Coyote and the Road Runner by using typography. Instead of using a formal script, the lettering is handwritten. His letters are unevenly sized and have a fun font that makes it feel mischievous in the same manor; Gary Larson’s comic gives you different emotions based upon the two sets of dialogue. The “chicken scratch” that is written on the floor and doors makes the dog seem literate and able to form ideas and put plans into motion. Yet there is one flaw in the dogs “literacy”, he is unable to spell out such a simplistic word as food. This starts to undermine the dog’s intelligence and makes the viewer question his motive. When looking closely at the writing on the box, it is slanted and looks like it was hastily written on the side. Inside the thought bubble, the dog’s thoughts are written in a much neater script. It makes the reader think about whether the dog’s thoughts are slightly scatterbrained or not.

Finally, the aesthetic elements in the comic reinforce the predator vs. prey theme and combine it with anthropomorphism. This comic strip is set in what viewers would believe to be a laundry room. He pieces in seemingly pointless and common details into the picture, however each element works together to give the viewer more insight. The directions and written words give the idea of a plot made to draw the cat into the laundry room. Not only is this giving him/her human-like qualities, it is also representing some sort of intelligence in regards to the dog. With the cat standing in front of the dryer with the text on the door, our assumption becomes clearer in that we can now bring to consideration that his plan is to make the cat crawl into the dryer to have the door shut on it. At first glance, you see the box on top of the washer as cat food that the dog probably used to try and lure the cat into the dryer. However, the cupboard door above the washer and dryer is open. This cupboard is, in most cases, where most people keep their detergent for their laundering needs. Detergent, as we know, is not meant for consumption in any case. A dog climbing up to get the detergent from the cabinet and putting it into the dryer is not seen as a big surprise. Another element in this image is the word “ACME” written on the front of the detergent box. If we go back again to the Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner cartoon, we can see that every object that Wiley uses to try and capture the Road Runner has the same word written on the box or item itself. When you combine the fact that the box not only comes from a detergent cabinet, but is also labeled “ACME” you can come to the conclusion that it is meant to kill or injure the cat. Just like in the other predator vs. prey comics or cartoons, the dog has gained the intelligence and plotting ability that is well known to humans. And even further, with the placement upon the washing machine viewers can assume that it was put into the dryer for the cat to eat. This set up is made into a Wiley Coyote and Road Runner relationship between the cat and dog and instills once again the well known cat chasing dog idea.

In conclusion, Gary Larson has used elements in this comic that show the dog chasing cat theme. Like in older cartoons and comic strips the artists enhance their characters through anthropomorphism. However, it is now shoved under the rug like it is common everyday occurrences to have a dog talk to its owner, or run around on its hind legs to get to a desired goal. Larson presented this argument through his many animal characters in his Far Side comics to try and bring back the humor of animals being able to use characteristics of a human.

Works Cited:

(2009). Anthropomorphism. Wikipedia. Retrieved (2009, November 17) from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropomorphism

Wysocki, Anne, and Lynch Dennis. Compose, design, advocate. New York: Pearson Education, Inc., 2007.

Links

Statement of Purpose

1st Rough Draft

2nd Rough Draft

Author's Note

When asked to pick a comic to analyze for our second writing project I had issues trying to decide what comic would yield the most potential for an analysis. In the end I decided to use a Far Side comic. I felt this one was rather humorous. I also had a personal connection to it. Growing up, my mother received a coffee mug with my chosen comic on it. My brother and I would fight over who got to use it. I felt like my comic held potential for the project I was supposed to present. I did however find it difficult to find an argument that was developed in this comic. I had to look into the aesthetics of the comic and try to see the meaning in them. In the last project we worked on, I was the one who placed an argument in my own work using aesthetics. However, this time around I was supposed to find how this artist used rhetorical elements to present an idea. This was a new experience for me to learn from.

While writing my analysis, I came across some barriers. When I was first writing my rough draft I did not come up with a strong argument. In all honesty I didn’t have an argument at all. I became very redundant and did not get around to making most of my points. My essay itself turned into a project that was struggling to get the word count and criteria, but not getting information on my comic specifically. For example, I said that my comic expressed the “dog chasing cat” argument. But when I received feedback and looked back through the elements of the comic. I found that it was not an appropriate argument to present to my audience.

For my revised work I had to reread through my rough draft and see what specific parts needed changing and where to begin with those changes. After I finished reading through my work, I felt that it would be best to, more or less, start from scratch with a whole new argument. After going in to get help finding an argument, I focused on anthropomorphism and how it has changed since its first uses. I did research on the background and details of anthropomorphism and tried to incorporate it within my paper. I felt that in order to help the audience understand my argument I would need to give examples from not only my comic, but the works of others as well. I felt that my argument was developed through the context of the image, the typography, and the aesthetics placed throughout the comic. Developing my conclusion also brought another hurdle for me to overcome. I needed to find a way in which to bring my analysis to a close while giving the audience an answer to the question “so what?” I decided to close it talking about how the use of anthropomorphism has changed. After receiving feedback from my second draft, I needed to work on my transitions and put in additional information about the use of typography. I went back to CDA and found ways in which the text helped the argument.

I feel that after doing this project I will have a better idea of how to try and find arguments in the works of others.